Skip to main content

LOGISTICS TECH STANDARD

Through the AX of trucks, LTS reports safety and carbon data to primary logistics contractors in real time

Primary logistics contractors receive the part of their partner carriers' truck trip, fuel, electricity and risky-driving data that covers their own cargo, and use it directly for emissions reporting per shipper and safety monitoring. LTS DTG collects the data on the truck; LTS Cloud then uses the LAS engine to determine which primary contractor receives it and the LCS engine to calculate emissions.

LTS DTG · CAN signalsCollecting
Sampling interval0.1 sVehicle profiles44Sent toLTS Cloud

Technology film

How truck trip data becomessafety and carbon reports

Part 1AX · AI transformation of transport data

Problem

90% of trucks are owner-driven and multi-tier subcontractingbreaks collection, so primary contractors estimate, not measure

SubcontractedcarriersOwn monitoringand ExcelSecond-tiercarriersHandwritten recordsOwner-drivers90% of trucksData collection stopsShipperRequests emissionsand safety recordsSafety and emissionsreported to shipperEstimateNo measured basisOwn fleetPrimary contractorMonitors only its own fleetTrip dataDispatchSubcontracted carriersOwn monitoring and ExcelSecond-tier carriersHandwritten recordsOwner-drivers90% of trucksData collection stopsShipperRequests emissionsand safety recordsSafety and emissionsreported to shipperEstimateNo measured basisPrimary contractorMonitors only its own fleetOwn fleetTrip dataDispatch
A truck cab with the trip recorder on the dashboard
Legally mandated trip recorder

The digital tachograph (legally mandated trip recorder) does not record fuel or electricity consumption.

A desk where partner Excel files and binders are copied by hand
Manual collection every quarter

Primary contractors ask partner carriers for Excel files, and staff re-enter the data by hand.

A dispatch office desk stacked with paper transport documents
Subcontracted carriers refuse to submit

Fuel consumption reveals costs and trip records reveal accident liability, so subcontracted carriers refuse to submit them.

Carbon and safety

With the same raw data, primary contractors handleboth carbon reporting and safety monitoring

CarbonISO 14083 calculation and reporting

LTS Cloud calculates with Korean emission factors through the LCS engine. For heavy trucks, the results differ by 22% from products that use European factors.

Carbon solution →
LTS Cloud data quality analysis screen

SafetyRisky-driving and hazardous-materials transport monitoring

LTS Cloud determines 11 types of risky driving with evidence waveforms, and primary contractors check transport conditions before the cargo arrives.

Safety solution →
LTS Cloud operations screen — live vehicle locations with trip and risky-driving records

SFC certification CRT 020ISO 14083 · GLEC Framework

LTS Cloud is the first tool in Korea certified by SFC under the GLEC Framework.

Part of the SFC certificate

CES 2026 Innovation AwardLTS AI DTG · AI tachograph

LTS AI DTG, an AI tachograph that determines 11 types of risky driving and impacts on the device in real time, received the CES 2026 Innovation Award.

View LTS AI DTG →
Outdoor display for the CES 2026 Innovation Award (GLEC AI Tachograph)

LTS Cloud

LTS offers LTS Cloud as two web services: one forprimary contractors, one for subcontracted carriers

For primary contractors

LTS Cloud for primary contractor HQ

Primary contractor HQ receives the part of partner carriers' trip, fuel, electricity and risky-driving records that covers its own cargo, and issues emissions and safety records per shipper.

  • Automatic collection of partner carriers' transport data
  • Emissions and safety records issued per shipper
  • Primary, secondary or default quality grade for each data point
LTS Cloud
Tap to enlarge
For carriers

LTS Cloud for subcontracted carriers

Subcontracted carriers manage trip records for their own vehicles and submit the data primary contractors request directly from LTS Cloud for carriers.

  • Vehicle, driver and trip record management
  • Submission of data requested by primary contractors
  • Driver safe-driving report
LTS Cloud
Tap to enlarge

Companies and institutions we work with

Logistics companies and public institutions have startedmeasuring transport data with LTS

Hanjin
Sunjin Networks
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance
Hwamulman
Yeosu Gwangyang Port Authority
Incheon International Airport Corporation
Bodyfriend
Patent applicationsMinister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport commendation (CEOs Kim Eun-woo and Kang Deok-ho)SFC certification CRT 020CES 2026 Innovation Award (LTS AI DTG · AI tachograph)500+ trucks monitored through 2025

01 Collect · LTS DTG

As the one legally mandated trip recorder, LTS DTGcollects the vehicle's CAN signals every 0.1 seconds

Carriers do not install an additional device. LTS DTG interprets fuel, electricity and trip data with 44 vehicle-model CAN profiles, and also collects battery signals from electric buses and cargo-handling equipment.

  • CAN 0.1 s
  • 44 vehicle-model CAN profiles
  • Trip recorder type approval

More on LTS DTG →

Photo of LTS DTG
CAN signalsEvery 0.1 s
Sent to LTS CloudTrip, fuel, electricity

02 Interpretation

LAS interprets manufacturer-specific CAN signals with 44vehicle-model profiles and outputs fuel and electricity use

Verified profiles are signed and distributed over the air (OTA), so carriers do not replace devices when they add new vehicle models.

1Raw CAN frames1A4E2 87 FD 60 BF 8B2F087 83 16 1E 15 390C809 D8 A6 BE DB E13B10E 3B CC 33 41 4F1A4E2 87 FD 7E E7 8B2F087 83 16 1E 82 C20C809 D8 A6 BE 7D 7C3B10E 3B CC 33 23 251A4E2 87 FD 88 64 8B2F087 83 16 1E 6C 170C809 D8 A6 BE AE E73B10E 3B CC 33 F0 752Signal boundariesBoundary3Compare with vehicle motionGPS speedCandidate signalCheck scale & offset candidates4Vehicle-model profileSigned profile bundleIDBit rangeScaleOffsetSignal name1A4Fuel rateDecodedCandidateUnresolvedDeployDeployOTAFuel rateVehicle speedBattery state of chargeLTS DTG
Order table · two rowsShipperPickupDrop-offPlate no.Shipper AShipper BState computed onceVehicle signals · valuesState builder describes each segmentTable type?Order listDispatch sheetOrder listDispatch sheetWhich column is pickup?Col 1Col 2Col 3Col 1Col 2Col 3Hazmat in first row?YesNoYesNoPlate number present?YesNoYesNoISO 14083 field coverage?12341234ChoiceTable typeShipment order listConfidence 1.00Yes/NoFirst-row hazmatProbability of true 0.12ScoreISO 14083 fields metExpected level 2.981234Probabilityof true01Low thresholdHigh thresholdConfirm No at onceLAS second passConfirm Yes at once
1 truck · 3 consolidated loads1 trip · one fuel signal per vehicleContractor A · 3.2 tSeoul→DaejeonContractor B · 2.6 tSeoul→DaeguContractor C · 1.8 tSeoul→BusanVehicle signal · LTS DTGFuel rate, distance, time — not split by cargoOrder · dispatch dataOrder · dispatch dataLAS engineMaps order × dispatch × vehicle signalWhich cargo was loaded?Which cargo was loaded?Do segment and time match?Do segment and time match?Tonne-km for each cargo?Tonne-km for each cargo?Tonne-km allocationTonne-km allocationDeterminingDeterminedContractor A cargo3.2 t × Seoul→Daejeon distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor A cargo3.2 t × Seoul→Daejeon distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor A viewScope 3 transport emissionsContractor B cargo2.6 t × Seoul→Daegu distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor B cargo2.6 t × Seoul→Daegu distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor B viewScope 3 transport emissionsContractor C cargo1.8 t × Seoul→Busan distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor C cargo1.8 t × Seoul→Busan distance= tonne-km → cargo's emissionsContractor C viewScope 3 transport emissionsUnclassified cargo → LAS second-pass determinationAmbiguous cargo is checked against all candidate ordersin the LAS second pass and confirmed · this trip: 0
Primary contractorLTS Cloud
LTS Cloud risky-driving event screen
Safety · risky-driving determination
LTS Cloud report creation screen
Carbon · per-cargo emissions calculation
ShipperPer-cargo report
Safety · risky-driving determination
Carbon · per-cargo emissions calculation
ISO 14083SFC certification CRT 020GLEC Framework

LAS measured · 180 dispatches

The LAS engine resolved 180 dispatches in 5.0 seconds,35× and 95× faster than two frontier language models

5.0 sTo resolve all 180 dispatches
35×Speed vs. Claude Fable 5.1176.1 s → 5.0 s
95×Speed vs. GPT-6 Astra477.8 s → 5.0 s
0.65 KRWCost per runOver 2,000× lower than both models
Time and cost to finish the same full job — 180 dispatchesNormalize primary-contractor order, dispatch and DTG trip CSVs → match dispatches to orders → allocate consolidated loads → total per primary contractor180 dispatches · median of 3 runs per engine · public API rates (checked 2026-09-29) · exchange rate KRW 1,359.4/USD (2026-09-29)Time: LAS = server processing time · LLMs = call round-trip time (end to end)Engine elapsed timePlayback at 60× · same speed from start to finish01 min2 min3 min4 min5 min6 min7 min8 minLAS engineCorrect in all 3 runsCumulative costClaude Fable 5.1Correct in all 3 runsCumulative costGPT-6 AstraCorrect in all 3 runsCumulative cost0:00.0Processing · 0.0 sProcessing · 0.0 sProcessing · 0.0 s0.00 KRW0.0 KRW0.0 KRW0:05.0Processing · 5.0 sProcessing · 5.0 s50.0 KRWProcessing · 5.0 s14.9 KRW0:10.0Finished the same job 2 times meanwhileProcessing · 10.0 s100.0 KRWProcessing · 10.0 s29.7 KRW0:15.0Finished the same job 3 times meanwhileProcessing · 15.0 s149.9 KRWProcessing · 15.0 s44.6 KRW0:20.0Finished the same job 4 times meanwhileProcessing · 20.0 s199.9 KRWProcessing · 20.0 s59.4 KRW0:25.0Finished the same job 5 times meanwhileProcessing · 25.0 s249.9 KRWProcessing · 25.0 s74.3 KRW0:30.0Finished the same job 6 times meanwhileProcessing · 30.0 s299.9 KRWProcessing · 30.0 s89.1 KRW0:35.0Finished the same job 7 times meanwhileProcessing · 35.0 s349.9 KRWProcessing · 35.0 s104.0 KRW0:40.0Finished the same job 8 times meanwhileProcessing · 40.0 s399.8 KRWProcessing · 40.0 s118.8 KRW0:45.0Finished the same job 9 times meanwhileProcessing · 45.0 s449.8 KRWProcessing · 45.0 s133.7 KRW0:50.0Finished the same job 10 times meanwhileProcessing · 50.0 s499.8 KRWProcessing · 50.0 s148.6 KRW0:55.0Finished the same job 11 times meanwhileProcessing · 55.0 s549.8 KRWProcessing · 55.0 s163.4 KRW1:00.0Finished the same job 12 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 00 s599.8 KRWProcessing · 1 min 00 s178.3 KRW1:05.0Finished the same job 13 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 05 s649.7 KRWProcessing · 1 min 05 s193.1 KRW1:10.0Finished the same job 14 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 10 s699.7 KRWProcessing · 1 min 10 s208.0 KRW1:15.0Finished the same job 15 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 15 s749.7 KRWProcessing · 1 min 15 s222.8 KRW1:20.0Finished the same job 16 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 20 s799.7 KRWProcessing · 1 min 20 s237.7 KRW1:25.0Finished the same job 17 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 25 s849.7 KRWProcessing · 1 min 25 s252.5 KRW1:30.0Finished the same job 18 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 30 s899.6 KRWProcessing · 1 min 30 s267.4 KRW1:35.0Finished the same job 19 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 35 s949.6 KRWProcessing · 1 min 35 s282.3 KRW1:40.0Finished the same job 20 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 40 s999.6 KRWProcessing · 1 min 40 s297.1 KRW1:45.0Finished the same job 21 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 45 s1,049.6 KRWProcessing · 1 min 45 s312.0 KRW1:50.0Finished the same job 22 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 50 s1,099.6 KRWProcessing · 1 min 50 s326.8 KRW1:55.0Finished the same job 23 times meanwhileProcessing · 1 min 55 s1,149.5 KRWProcessing · 1 min 55 s341.7 KRW2:00.0Finished the same job 24 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 00 s1,199.5 KRWProcessing · 2 min 00 s356.5 KRW2:05.0Finished the same job 25 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 05 s1,249.5 KRWProcessing · 2 min 05 s371.4 KRW2:10.0Finished the same job 26 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 10 s1,299.5 KRWProcessing · 2 min 10 s386.2 KRW2:15.0Finished the same job 27 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 15 s1,349.5 KRWProcessing · 2 min 15 s401.1 KRW2:20.0Finished the same job 28 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 20 s1,399.4 KRWProcessing · 2 min 20 s416.0 KRW2:25.0Finished the same job 29 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 25 s1,449.4 KRWProcessing · 2 min 25 s430.8 KRW2:30.0Finished the same job 30 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 30 s1,499.4 KRWProcessing · 2 min 30 s445.7 KRW2:35.0Finished the same job 31 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 35 s1,549.4 KRWProcessing · 2 min 35 s460.5 KRW2:40.0Finished the same job 32 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 40 s1,599.4 KRWProcessing · 2 min 40 s475.4 KRW2:45.0Finished the same job 33 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 45 s1,649.3 KRWProcessing · 2 min 45 s490.2 KRW2:50.0Finished the same job 34 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 50 s1,699.3 KRWProcessing · 2 min 50 s505.1 KRW2:55.0Finished the same job 35 times meanwhileProcessing · 2 min 55 s1,749.3 KRWProcessing · 2 min 55 s519.9 KRW3:00.0Finished the same job 36 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 00 s534.8 KRW3:05.0Finished the same job 37 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 05 s549.7 KRW3:10.0Finished the same job 38 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 10 s564.5 KRW3:15.0Finished the same job 39 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 15 s579.4 KRW3:20.0Finished the same job 40 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 20 s594.2 KRW3:25.0Finished the same job 41 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 25 s609.1 KRW3:30.0Finished the same job 42 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 30 s623.9 KRW3:35.0Finished the same job 43 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 35 s638.8 KRW3:40.0Finished the same job 44 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 40 s653.6 KRW3:45.0Finished the same job 45 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 45 s668.5 KRW3:50.0Finished the same job 46 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 50 s683.4 KRW3:55.0Finished the same job 47 times meanwhileProcessing · 3 min 55 s698.2 KRW4:00.0Finished the same job 48 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 00 s713.1 KRW4:05.0Finished the same job 49 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 05 s727.9 KRW4:10.0Finished the same job 50 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 10 s742.8 KRW4:15.0Finished the same job 51 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 15 s757.6 KRW4:20.0Finished the same job 52 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 20 s772.5 KRW4:25.0Finished the same job 53 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 25 s787.3 KRW4:30.0Finished the same job 54 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 30 s802.2 KRW4:35.0Finished the same job 55 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 35 s817.1 KRW4:40.0Finished the same job 56 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 40 s831.9 KRW4:45.0Finished the same job 57 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 45 s846.8 KRW4:50.0Finished the same job 58 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 50 s861.6 KRW4:55.0Finished the same job 59 times meanwhileProcessing · 4 min 55 s876.5 KRW5:00.0Finished the same job 60 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 00 s891.3 KRW5:05.0Finished the same job 61 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 05 s906.2 KRW5:10.0Finished the same job 62 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 10 s921.0 KRW5:15.0Finished the same job 63 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 15 s935.9 KRW5:20.0Finished the same job 64 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 20 s950.8 KRW5:25.0Finished the same job 65 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 25 s965.6 KRW5:30.0Finished the same job 66 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 30 s980.5 KRW5:35.0Finished the same job 67 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 35 s995.3 KRW5:40.0Finished the same job 68 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 40 s1,010.2 KRW5:45.0Finished the same job 69 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 45 s1,025.0 KRW5:50.0Finished the same job 70 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 50 s1,039.9 KRW5:55.0Finished the same job 71 times meanwhileProcessing · 5 min 55 s1,054.7 KRW6:00.0Finished the same job 72 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 00 s1,069.6 KRW6:05.0Finished the same job 73 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 05 s1,084.5 KRW6:10.0Finished the same job 74 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 10 s1,099.3 KRW6:15.0Finished the same job 75 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 15 s1,114.2 KRW6:20.0Finished the same job 76 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 20 s1,129.0 KRW6:25.0Finished the same job 77 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 25 s1,143.9 KRW6:30.0Finished the same job 78 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 30 s1,158.7 KRW6:35.0Finished the same job 79 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 35 s1,173.6 KRW6:40.0Finished the same job 80 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 40 s1,188.4 KRW6:45.0Finished the same job 81 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 45 s1,203.3 KRW6:50.0Finished the same job 82 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 50 s1,218.2 KRW6:55.0Finished the same job 83 times meanwhileProcessing · 6 min 55 s1,233.0 KRW7:00.0Finished the same job 84 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 00 s1,247.9 KRW7:05.0Finished the same job 85 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 05 s1,262.7 KRW7:10.0Finished the same job 86 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 10 s1,277.6 KRW7:15.0Finished the same job 87 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 15 s1,292.4 KRW7:20.0Finished the same job 88 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 20 s1,307.3 KRW7:25.0Finished the same job 89 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 25 s1,322.1 KRW7:30.0Finished the same job 90 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 30 s1,337.0 KRW7:35.0Finished the same job 91 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 35 s1,351.9 KRW7:40.0Finished the same job 92 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 40 s1,366.7 KRW7:45.0Finished the same job 93 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 45 s1,381.6 KRW7:50.0Finished the same job 94 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 50 s1,396.4 KRW7:55.0Finished the same job 95 times meanwhileProcessing · 7 min 55 s1,411.3 KRWDone · 5.0 s0.65 KRWDone · 176.1 sLAS: 35 times meanwhile1,760.3 KRW7:57.8Finished the same job 95 times meanwhileDone · 477.8 sLAS: 95 times meanwhile1,419.6 KRWvs. Claude Fable 5.135× faster at 1/2,708 of the costvs. GPT-6 Astra95× faster at 1/2,184 of the cost

LTS measurement 2026-09-29 · three sets of primary-contractor order spreadsheets, carrier dispatches, DTG trip records · median of 3 runs per engine · all three engines correct in all 3 runs · video at 60× speed

Part 2EACs · international transport insetting credits for EV transition

International transport insetting credits for EV transition (EACs)

Emissions actually reduced by electric buses and electric trucks become EACs on an international registry through LTS measurement

What EACs are

EACs are transport insetting credits for measured reductionsfrom electric transport, issued on an international registry

Cargo is carried by the original vehicle, and only the reduction attribute is recorded in the registry. Shippers buy these certificates and apply them to their own transport emissions reporting (Book & Claim). Issuance covers switching vehicles used for passenger and freight transport to electric.

  • Book & Claim
  • 1 tonne = 1 certificate
  • Passenger and freight vehicles
1Cargo transportDiesel truck · Shipper A's cargo travels on this truck as isShipper A'scustomer2Environmental attribute recordElectric truck on another route · 1 t reduction, measuredRegistryIndependently verified · 1 t = 1 certificateRegistryIndependently verified · 1 t = 1 certificateKR-0001IssuedKR-0001Transferred to Shipper A · usedBook · recordShipper ABuys and uses the certificateShipper ABuys and uses the certificateUsed · retiredClaim · useEAC certificateNo. KR-0001Shipper A cargoOther cargo1t

Why now

EACs accept only the most recent year of reduction data,so reductions from years without issuance are lost

10 years after first purchase · period when EACs can be issuedYear 11 year's worthYear 21 year's worthYear 31 year's worthYear 41 year's worthYear 51 year's worthYear 61 year's worthYear 71 year's worthYear 81 year's worthYear 91 year's worthYear 101 year's worthYear 1Can be issuedYear 1LostYear 2Can be issuedYear 2LostYear 3Can be issuedThis year

Regardless of when vehicles were switched to electric, issuance accepts only reduction data from the most recent year, and carriers issue EACs every year within 10 years of the vehicle's first purchase. Airlines also buy EACs for emissions reporting on their ground transport operations, such as buses and trucks.

Money lost every year

Carriers that switched to electric buses but do not issue EACslose about KRW 10.79 million per bus every year

Reductions from a year without issuance cannot be issued in a later year, so losses build up every year from the day of the switch to electric. As the number of vehicles grows, losses grow in the same proportion.

  • Electric buses85.27 t per vehicle per year · Based on a measurement contract
    KRW 10.79 million every yearKRW 107.94 million over 10 years
  • Electric yard tractor77.7 t per vehicle per year · Port authority sustainability report
    KRW 9.84 million every yearKRW 98.36 million over 10 years
  • Electric transfer crane144.2 t per vehicle per year · Measured in a registered offset project
    KRW 18.25 million every yearKRW 182.54 million over 10 years
  • Heavy electric truck31.9 t per vehicle per year · Estimate
    KRW 4.04 million every yearKRW 40.38 million over 10 years

Based on KRW 150,000 per tonne · amount received by the issuer after 123Carbon registration fees and LTS fees · heavy electric truck is an estimate · applies only to vehicles used for passenger and freight transport

Registration and trading

LTS is the official agent of 123Carbon and currentlythe only company issuing transport EACs in Korea

123Carbon

The only EACs registry in the world

Headquartered in Australia, it handles EACs registration and issuance for global logistics companies such as DHL and DP World.

Carboninsets

The only exchange for EACs

Issued EACs are traded here. It has signed a business cooperation NDA with LTS that goes further than an MOU.

LTS

Official agent of 123Carbon

Measures and calculates reductions with LTS DTG and LTS Cloud, and handles EACs issuance for Korean carriers.

Issuance process

Carriers issue and sell EACs in four steps:measurement, normalization, verification and registration

  1. 01

    Measurement

    LTS DTG collects electricity and trip data from electric vehicles.

  2. 02

    Normalization

    The LAS engine normalizes trip records and dispatches, and LTS Cloud uses the LCS engine to calculate reductions under ISO 14083. This takes about one month.

  3. 03

    Verification

    An independent verification body verifies the reductions and the calculation basis. This takes about one month.

  4. 04

    Registration and sale

    EACs are issued on the 123Carbon registry and sold on Carboninsets. This takes about one month.

DTG trip recordsPer secondCharger energykWhDispatch · ordersExcelFreight volumet·kmVehicle specsDocumentsManual totals in Excel · sources hard to traceLTS CloudSFC certification · CRT 0201Normalize formats and unitsIn one place by vehicle, period, cargo2Check gaps and anomaliesHistory traced back to source records3ISO 14083 calculationWTW · GLEC FrameworkVerifiable reportReductions · basis · source listIndependent verification123Carbon registry1 t = 1 certificate issued

The carrier issuing EACs pays the registry fees to the registry.

Issuance in progress

LTS is issuing EACs for 500 Sunjin Group electric buseswith 123Carbon for the first time

500 busesElectric buses
42,635 tAnnual reduction (one year of issuance)
3 months or lessTarget to complete issuance and sale

123Carbon is matching buyers in the United States.

LTS builds logistics standard technology for the AI transformationand carbon-neutral transition of Korean freight transport

Talk to us

LTS recommends a setup that fitsyour fleet size and partner-carrier structure

In a consultation, an LTS representative explains the scope and terms of adoption for your fleet size and partner-carrier structure.

Request a consultation

We use your details only to respond to your request.

LTS — Logistics Standard Technology Company